With legal jargon flying as fast as promises allegedly made by Nimako, the court ruled that Adablah failed to serve up any reasonable cause of action and questioned the very legal foundation of the supposed contract at the heart of this melodrama. They boldly asserted that, if there was any contract in question, it was as legally binding as a handshake in the dark.
Adablah, on her part, had spun a web of broken promises and dashed dreams before the court. She accused Nimako of reneging on a laundry list of commitments, including the withdrawal of a car gift after just one year, covering only a fraction of the promised three-year accommodation, and failing to deliver on a monthly stipend that would make most people green with envy.
In response to these allegations, the court did not merely throw the book at Adablah; it practically launched the entire library. The court, perhaps in a bid to showcase its comedic timing, suggested that Adablah might find solace in the realm of reality rather than relying on sugar-coated promises. In a surprising twist, legal experts are now predicting a potential surge in sales of self-help books and resilience seminars, as individuals across the country reevaluate their relationship contracts and wonder if their own promises are as legally airtight as they once believed.
Only time will tell if this courtroom saga has truly reached its final chapter or if a sequel awaits in the wings. Source: GhanaFeed. Connect with us. Related Topics: Court throws out sidechick case. You may like.
