It aims at finding out if direct visual reference to sex-related body parts or concepts is taboo to Deaf signers and if this is the case, what strategies they adopt to form the corresponding euphemistic expressions. It will be argued that even though Deaf signers are used to the visual explicitness of the signing modality, the highly iconic nature of certain sex-related signs can still be offensive at times, thus giving rise to euphemistic expressions.
While certain euphemistic strategies by the Deaf signers target at toning down the degree of visual iconicity originally associated with the taboo signs, most of the remaining strategies show striking resemblance to those used in spoken languages, suggesting the universality of these verbal politeness strategies across language modalities.
Euphemism and dysphemism: Language used as shield and weapon. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar. Forbidden words. New York: Cambridge University Press. Bad language. Burridge, Kate. Euphemism and language change: The sixth and seventh ages. Lexis 7. Signs of a sexual nature: An introduction to some sexual signs used in British sign language. Northwich: Cheshire Society for the Deaf.
Cooper, David. Oxford: Blackwell. Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. Point of view expressed through shifters. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Fischer, Susan. Sign language field methods: Approaches, techniques, and concerns. In James H-Y.
Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Linfoot-Ham, Kerry. The linguistics of euphemism: A diachronic study of euphemism formation. Journal of Language and Linguistics 4 2. Meir, Irit. Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical extension of iconic forms.
