data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b550/4b5502e5e5667b7d046ef6db6e58fd872844dff9" alt=""
WEIGHT: 54 kg
Bust: Medium
One HOUR:250$
NIGHT: +30$
Services: BDSM, Toys, Bondage, Deep throating, French Kissing
News That Matters Support us. Among the snooping revelations of recent weeks, there have been tantalizing bits of evidence that the NSA is tapping fiber-optic cables that carry nearly all international phone and Internet data. In late , the New York Times first described the tapping, which began after the Sept. The most detailed, though now dated, information on the topic comes from Mark Klein. These cables carry vast quantities of information, including 99 percent of international phone and Internet data, according to research firm TeleGeography.
The NSA is listening in on those taps too. But even if the NSA is tapping only international fiber optic cables, it could still pick up communications between Americans in the U. Google, for example, maintains a network of data centers around the world. She declined to answer. The Washington Post had a story earlier this month about agreements the government has struck with telecoms, but lots of details are still unclear, including what the government is getting, and how many companies are cooperating.
That agreement, which the Post says became a model for similar deals with other companies, did not authorize surveillance. Global Crossing was later sold to Colorado-based Level 3 Communications , which owns many international fiber optic cables , and the agreement was replaced in More evidence, though somewhat dated, of corporate cooperation with NSA upstream surveillance comes from the inspector general report.
That legislation amended the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the s law that governs government surveillance in the United States. The government has so-called minimization procedures that are supposed to limit the surveillance of American citizens or people in the U.
Those procedures are subject to review by the FISA court. Despite the procedures, there is evidence that in practice American communications are swept up by surveillance under this section. And according to minimization procedures dating from published by the Guardian, there are also exceptions when it comes to holding on to American communications. For example, encrypted communications β which, given the routine use of digital encryption, might include vast amounts of material β can be kept indefinitely.