data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87c1c/87c1c3be9a6554add27d0549a59be4b345e3b748" alt=""
WEIGHT: 64 kg
Bust: 3
One HOUR:60$
NIGHT: +100$
Services: Food Sex, Hand Relief, Slave, Fetish, Facial
One of the biggest points of disagreement among the horological faithful is whether or not a smartwatch โ the Apple Watch, let's say, although of course you can say this about any smartwatch โ is really a watch. The argument is, of course, less one about definitions and more a way of expressing either a commendable broad-mindedness about what can go on the wrist, or expressing a commendable detestation of electronic wrist devices and all they stand for.
Perhaps the only thing more divisive than smartwatches and their ilk, is the question of how to wear one. I doubt that anyone reading this substitutes a smartwatch for a mechanical watch with any regularity, but those of us who wear one I usually wear an Apple Watch also often pair it with a mechanical watch on the other wrist. This makes sense, but the fact is it feels weird.
It probably shouldn't feel any weirder than wearing a watch at all in fact, some people dislike having any watch on their wrist โ strange I know, but true but long habit has gotten us watch enthusiasts used to having one watch on, period, and wearing two undoubtedly feels funny โ and in a way that even persistence doesn't necessarily completely eradicate.
After several years of doing it, however, I have noticed that there are ways of pairing a smartwatch with a mechanical watch that feel a bit more natural. The Apple Watch shot for this story is a Series 7, 45mm model.
Wearing a watch on one wrist means an asymmetrical distribution and double-wristing feels odd partly because it just doesn't feel normal to have two objects of similar sizes on both the left and the right wrist.