data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5890a/5890ae2100586b5ade68dd28330ecf691ddf9d8a" alt=""
WEIGHT: 66 kg
Breast: A
1 HOUR:100$
NIGHT: +70$
Services: Cross Dressing, Cum on breast, Parties, Striptease amateur, Lesbi-show hard
The world is split today into two hostile camps, fighting each other with the utmost vehemence, Communists and anti-Communists. They both aim at the abolition of private enterprise and private ownership of the means of production and at the establishment of socialism. They want to substitute totalitarian government control for the market economy.
No longer should individuals by their buying or abstention from buying determine what is to be produced and in what quantity and quality. The Fascists and the Nazis were no less eager to establish all-round regimentation of all economic activities than those governments and parties which flamboyantly advertise their anti-Fascist tenets.
And Mr. Peron in Argentina tries to enforce a scheme which is a replica of the New Deal and the Fair Deal and like these will, if not stopped in time, result in full socialism.
The great ideological conflict of our age must not be confused with the mutual rivalries among the various totalitarian movements. The real issue is not who should run the totalitarian apparatus. The real problem is whether or not socialism should supplant the market economy. World conditions have changed considerably since the first edition of my essay was published. But all these disastrous wars and revolutions, heinous mass murders and frightful catastrophes have not affected the main issue: the desperate struggle of lovers of freedom, prosperity and civilization against the rising tide of totalitarian barbarism.
In the Epilogue 1 deal with the most important aspects of the events of the last decades. A more detailed study of all the problems involved is to be found in three books of mine published by the Yale University Press:. Bureaucracy; 2. Human Action, a Treatise on Economics. It is a matter of dispute whether, prior to the middle of the nineteenth century, there existed any clear conception of the socialist idea β by which is understood the socialization of the means of production with its corollary, the centralized control of the whole of production by one social or, more accurately, state organ.