On October 19, , K. On November 13, , K. That petition alleged that K. After one witness was sworn and testimony given, the trial court recessed the hearing and continued the matter for further hearing on December 2, On December 2, , further hearing was held before a different judge who, after hearing and argument, took the matter under advisement.
On December 10, ,. On December 16, , K. We agree. Avanti Sadasivan, Ph. Sadasivan was a candidate to become a "Designated Forensic Professional" and, therefore, was under supervision in her position by Denise Mumley, Ph. Sadasivan completed her evaluation as to K. A petition pursuant G. WRCH's counsel contacted K. Under the provisions of G. Consequently, on November 25, , a hearing was commenced before the Worcester District Court.
After describing to the trial court the immediate unavailability of Dr. Sadasivan's supervisor, Dr. Mumley, to offer testimony to the court concerning the instant matter.
Mumley was sworn and gave testimony regarding her qualifications, her relationship to Dr. Sadasivan, and her involvement with K. Mumley was aware of KP. She testified that she was aware of the criminal charges that brought K. She further testified to K. Mumley indicated that she was supervising Dr. Sadasivan and was aware that Dr. Sadasivan had conducted several interviews with K. Sadasivan had prepared. She testified that she was aware that Dr. Sadasivan had also conducted interviews with collateral sources in the process of her forensic evaluation.
Mumley and requested that further testimony from Dr. Sadasivan be scheduled for the following Wednesday, December 2, After cross-examination of Dr. Mumley by K. After waiving her client's presence at the hearing, K.
