data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4729/a4729bdc905b36cf0607cf4b65583889d63902af" alt=""
WEIGHT: 46 kg
Breast: Small
1 HOUR:80$
NIGHT: +60$
Services: Striptease amateur, Massage erotic, Fetish, 'A' Levels, Uniforms
To browse Academia. The purpose of this book is to fill a gap in word-formation studies, specifically with regard to that part of morphology termed "extra-grammatical".
In the past, phenomena such as clippings, acronyms, blends, and reduplicatives were generally excluded from English grammars and major theoretical morphological works, or else they were marginalised to a peripheral, irrelevant, secondary role in morphology, subordinate to what is to be considered inside morphological grammar.
Recently, however, there has been a significant increase in the attention devoted to phenomena that lie outside grammatical morphology, probably as a result of their extensive use in the coinage of neologisms in all languages, and especially in English.
Yet these phenomena have been hitherto investigated only individually by scholars, and more for their relevance to the phonological system than as a set of processes that pertain to irregular morphology. This reference work on English morphology can be qualified as the for a long time needed successor to Marchand's famous handbook The categories and types of present-day English word formation, of which the second and last edition was published in The book to be reviewed here, however, has a larger scope, as it does not only deal with word formation but also with inflection.
Hence, it is a comprehensive book on English morphology. The authors of this book are all senior researchers in the domain of English morphology, with an individual track record of important publications on English morphology. So it was a good idea of these authors to work together to produce an authoritative volume on English morphology. What are the main features of this book compared to Marchand's book?